SURVIVAL TREE SCORE: A NOVEL APPROACH TO PREDICT MORTALITY IN CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS

Main Article Content

Samanta Teixeira BASTO
Emília Matos do NASCIMENTO
Basilio de Bragança PEREIRA
Joaquim RIBEIRO FILHO
Renata de Mello PEREZ
Cristiane Alves Villela NOGUEIRA

Abstract

Although Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is adopted worldwide for liver transplant allocation, but it has prognostic limitations. The aim of this study was to apply the survival tree analysis to evaluate interaction between variables related to mortality in cirrhotics patients enlisted for liver transplantation, and to develop a new mortality predictive score. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data of cirrhotic patients waiting for liver transplantation during a 12-year period were considered. Charts from 765 patients were reviewed. The interaction between prognostic covariates was obtained using a survival tree analysis. In order to develop the predictive score, Cox regression analysis was performed applying significant data obtained by the survival tree analysis. The prognostic covariates evaluated in the survival tree were MELD score, Child-Pugh score, serum sodium, viral disease etiology, hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and generated a coefficient for each. Based on the survival tree analysis, MELD = 15 was the primary root variable (p<0.001). The survival tree provided eight prognostic groups. The higher mortality hazard ratio (HR) risk was observed in the MELD >28 group (HR= 16.7).  The new score (Survival Tree Score – STS) was obtained according to the coefficients provided. The STS prognostic performance was superior to MELD score (AUROC 0.713 vs 0.653, p<0.001). STS, could be a useful tool to accurately identify individual mortality risk in advanced liver disease.

Article Details

How to Cite
BASTO, S. T., NASCIMENTO, E. M. do, PEREIRA, B. de B., RIBEIRO FILHO, J., PEREZ, R. de M., & NOGUEIRA, C. A. V. (2020). SURVIVAL TREE SCORE: A NOVEL APPROACH TO PREDICT MORTALITY IN CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS. Brazilian Journal of Biometrics, 38(4), 506–520. https://doi.org/10.28951/rbb.v38i4.464
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)